Kaspa has attracted attention as one of the few proof-of-work blockchains still expanding in 2025. The network introduced high-speed block processing and KRC-20 meme token support, giving it a unique position among legacy miners.
Its community engagement remains active, and whale accumulation has kept capitalization near $1.3 billion. Yet despite those strengths, the market’s short-term signals tell another story.
According to analysts at Traders Union, Kaspa continues to trade below every key moving average. Indicators such as MACD, ADX, RSI, and CCI all confirm downward pressure.
Sellers dominate liquidity on decentralized exchanges, and without strong buying volume, the trend remains negative. The group warns that price recovery will require a sustained break above $0.0544 — a level that has now turned into firm resistance. Until that threshold is reclaimed, most traders are keeping a defensive posture.
Proof-of-Work Strength Doesn’t Guarantee Market Stability
Proof-of-work systems like Kaspa excel in decentralization and security, but those advantages rarely stabilize token value during risk-off cycles. Mining networks depend on energy and hardware economics, not flexible liquidity models. When sentiment turns bearish, miner selling adds pressure, and the absence of algorithmic liquidity tools limits recovery options.
This imbalance is pushing investors to study projects that separate liquidity mechanics from base-layer consensus — an approach now embodied by XRP Tundra’s dual-chain model and its adaptive market-making infrastructure.
XRP Tundra Introduces Adaptive Liquidity Through DAMM V2
XRP Tundra implements Meteora’s Dynamic Automated Market Maker V2 (DAMM V2) to maintain liquidity stability for its TUNDRA-S token on Solana. Unlike static AMMs that apply fixed trading fees, DAMM V2 adjusts fees dynamically based on time and activity. The system launches with elevated fees that gradually decline, discouraging bots and early dumping while enabling genuine trading once equilibrium forms.
This configuration creates what developers describe as “self-normalizing liquidity.” Early volatility becomes expensive for speculators but profitable for liquidity providers and stakers. The mechanism converts initial market friction into sustainable yield distributed through Cryo Vault staking.
TUNDRA-S drives yield and utility, while TUNDRA-X, issued on the XRP Ledger, manages governance and reserves. Together they form a structure that keeps execution and control separate — a key difference from single-token, single-chain designs.
HotCuppaCrypto recently reviewed the presale and noted that adaptive liquidity tools like DAMM V2 “mirror institutional-grade safeguards,” highlighting how verified mechanics replace manual interventions in early trading.
Audited Architecture and Dual-Token Verification
XRP Tundra’s transparency extends beyond design. Three independent audits — Cyberscope, Solidproof, and FreshCoins — have verified the token contracts and vault logic, while Vital Block KYC confirmed the development team’s corporate identity.
The presale is now in Phase 9, offering TUNDRA-S at $0.147 with an 11% bonus, and a TUNDRA-X reference price of $0.0735. Listing levels of $2.5 and $1.25 are publicly defined. More than $2 million has been raised, alongside $32 000 in Arctic Spinner rewards, all recorded on-chain.
This open-data approach contrasts with the opaque token flows common in proof-of-work markets. Every presale phase publishes its parameters in advance, allowing participants to verify allocations before committing funds. The result is an environment where liquidity and accountability scale together.
Measured Liquidity as the New Standard for DeFi
Kaspa’s latest decline underscores how even well-developed proof-of-work projects remain exposed to market emotion. XRP Tundra represents a different trajectory: liquidity guided by audited algorithms rather than reactionary trading. DAMM V2 converts early speculation into structural depth, while the dual-token system spreads operational risk across two high-performance chains.
For investors comparing volatility profiles, the distinction is clear. Kaspa’s recovery depends on sentiment returning; Tundra’s performance depends on mathematics already coded into its pools. That separation of function is what gives adaptive AMMs their resilience — and why they’re attracting attention from market participants seeking stability beyond traditional mining economics.
As DeFi matures, projects that combine transparent architecture with algorithmic liquidity may define the next phase of dependable yield generation. XRP Tundra’s system illustrates how disciplined mechanics can replace momentum as the foundation of lasting market value.
Follow verified liquidity design over speculation. Secure your Phase 9 allocation and track audited updates before listing.
Buy Tundra Now: official XRP Tundra website
How to Buy Tundra: step-by-step guide
Security and Trust: FreshCoins audit
Join the Community: Telegram
This article is not investment advice. Please DYOR before investing in any cryptocurrency.