Reading: JPMorgan Misses the Point, Says Crypto Isn’t Currency

News

JPMorgan Misses the Point, Says Crypto Isn’t Currency

Adam James · @Shasdam | Feb 18, 2018 | 03:45

J.P. Morgan’s Quorum Facing Spin Off in Search for Differentiation News

JPMorgan Misses the Point, Says Crypto Isn’t Currency

Adam James · @Shasdam | Feb 18, 2018 | 03:45


Crypto isn’t currency — at least, according to American multinational banking and financial services holding company JPMorgan Chase & Co.


Missing the Point

JPMorgan, a New York-based institution with a history that is far from pro-crypto, claimed in a wide-ranging note to clients that cryptocurrencies only make sense as a hedge in one’s investment portfolio — and are neither viable stores of value nor effective currencies. Wrote the company:

The huge volatility of the price of cryptocurrencies — with respect to either traditional currencies or to a basket of goods and services — has made use of cryptocurrencies as a unit of account impractical. Only hobbyists are using cryptocurrencies as a medium of exchange, at least for conventional transactions for goods and services.

Indeed, cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Litecoin have struggled to gain mainstream adoption. However, the note fails to mention potential innovations — such as Bitcoin’s Lightning Network or the upcoming Visa-based Litecoin transaction service LitePay — which could make cryptocurrencies act more like traditional currencies and, thus, help foster widespread adoption.

fiat

JPMorgan further claims that, even if the value of cryptocurrencies wasn’t volatile, they’d have a hard time challenging traditional currencies, writing:

At any rate, even a hypothetically stable-value cryptocurrency is unlikely to compete with the dollar for transactions in goods and services, in say, Chicago, or to compete with the euro in Stuttgart.

Again, JPMorgan glosses over the cross-border benefits of cryptocurrencies. For example, a shop in Chicago is almost certainly not going to accept Hungarian forint as a form of payment — but Bitcoin’s entirely independent status makes it potentially attractive to vendors the world over.

The company tries to justify its stance by explaining the monopoly traditional currencies have on their local market, writing:

Economists have long viewed successful (i.e. relatively price-stable) currencies as natural monopolies in a given geographic area. This particular natural monopoly arises as a result of the inherent network externalities: pricing a New York meal in yen makes little sense, as almost all customers will be holding dollars.

cryptocurrency

Once more, the value of cryptocurrency as a monopoly-transcending form of currency available to everyone in the world appears lost on the company — whose CEO, Jamie Dimon, once called Bitcoin a fraud.

Do you think Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are viable currencies and/or stores of value? Does JPMorgan’s argument make sense to you? Let us know in the comments below!


Images courtesy of Reuters, Bitcoinist archives.


Show comments