• Press Releases
    • Submit a press release
    • Read All
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
Crypto.com Logo Crypto.com Logo
Bitcoinist.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Bitcoin
    • News
    • Price
    • Businesses
    • Acceptance
    • Technology
    • Investment
    • Regulation
    • Reviews
    • All Bitcoin News
  • Altcoins
    • News
    • Price
    • Ethereum
    • Ripple
    • Litecoin
    • EOS
    • NAGA
    • All Altcoin News
  • Tech
    • Blockchain
    • Security
    • FinTech
  • Industry
    • Press releases
  • Price
    • Bitcoin Price
    • Ethereum Price
    • Litecoin Price
    • Binance Coin Price
    • Monero Price
    • MimbleWimbleCoin Price
  • How to
    • Buy gift cards/mobile Top Ups with Cryptos
    • What Is Bitcoin?
    • Best Bitcoin Wallet
    • Bitcoin vs Ethereum
    • Why Use Blockchain Technology?
    • Bitcoin Cash ABC vs. Bitcoin Cash SV
    • How to Buy Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Mining
    • Best Bitcoin Brokers
    • Best Bitcoin Forex Brokers
    • How To Earn Bitcoin
    • What is Facebook Libra?
    • Ripple and XRP: The Complete Guide
    • Bitcoin Casinos – Where, What and How to Play
  • Play Games
  • BET&WIN
  • Bitcoin Casino Reviews
  • Bitcoin
    • News
    • Price
    • Businesses
    • Acceptance
    • Technology
    • Investment
    • Regulation
    • Reviews
    • All Bitcoin News
  • Altcoins
    • News
    • Price
    • Ethereum
    • Ripple
    • Litecoin
    • EOS
    • NAGA
    • All Altcoin News
  • Tech
    • Blockchain
    • Security
    • FinTech
  • Industry
    • Press releases
  • Price
    • Bitcoin Price
    • Ethereum Price
    • Litecoin Price
    • Binance Coin Price
    • Monero Price
    • MimbleWimbleCoin Price
  • How to
    • Buy gift cards/mobile Top Ups with Cryptos
    • What Is Bitcoin?
    • Best Bitcoin Wallet
    • Bitcoin vs Ethereum
    • Why Use Blockchain Technology?
    • Bitcoin Cash ABC vs. Bitcoin Cash SV
    • How to Buy Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Mining
    • Best Bitcoin Brokers
    • Best Bitcoin Forex Brokers
    • How To Earn Bitcoin
    • What is Facebook Libra?
    • Ripple and XRP: The Complete Guide
    • Bitcoin Casinos – Where, What and How to Play
  • Play Games
  • BET&WIN
  • Bitcoin Casino Reviews
Bitcoinist.com
No Result
View All Result
Bitcoin Mining profitability
Nexo

Thoughts on Bitcoin Block Size Economics

Evan Faggart by Evan Faggart
8 years ago
in Bitcoin, Bitcoin Technology, Mining, News, News teaser
0
Advertisement

In October of 2014, Gavin Andresen sparked a community-wide debate over the future of the hard-coded, 1 MB size-cap on Bitcoin blocks. Andresen proposed a change to the Bitcoin protocol that would implement an upward-scaling block size limit, necessitating a hard-fork of the blockchain.

Bitcoin Mining Profitability
Gavin Andresen in “The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin”

Many people opposed this idea — mainly on economic grounds. They argued that a constantly increasing block size limit would make the supply of block-space far outstrip the demand for transactions, which would greatly diminish transaction fees. Falling transaction fees would become a severe problem once the maximum Bitcoin supply had been mined, since the only remaining incentive for miners to uphold the network would be those fees. Falling fees would make mining unprofitable, forcing miners to shut down their rigs, thereby jeopardizing the security of the Bitcoin network.

5 BTC + 300 Free Spins for new players & 15 BTC + 35.000 Free Spins every month, only at mBitcasino. Play Now!

Gavin responded to these arguments in a post on the Bitcoin Foundation’s blog ten days after his initial proposal. However, the debate did not go much farther than that, as other news pushed the block size limit issue aside.

A few months later, in January of 2015, Andresen somewhat revived the discussion by posting the results of a 20 MB block size test on his personal blog. Gavin reported that his test was an overall success, and that he saw no reason why the network could not handle an increased block size. Despite the technical success of Andresen’s test, detractors say that raising the block size limit will still be an economic failure.

I disagree with the economic arguments against raising the block size limit, because network security cannot be influenced by the block size limit in any meaningful way. Mining centralization occurs both when the hash rate grows and declines, meaning that network security is not an issue of Bitcoin mining profitability. Hopefully, the following economic analysis will adequately support my argument, as well as clear up the confusion present in this debate.

BitStarz Player Lands $2,459,124 Record Win! Could you be next big winner?
Get 110 USDT Futures Bonus for FREE!

Bitcoin Miners Will Not Let Transaction Fees Fall to an Unprofitable Level

There are two important characteristics about Bitcoin mining that will prevent fees from falling to an unprofitable level with a large block size. Bitcoin miners are human, which makes them rational and economic actors, and they have the ability to choose the size of the blocks they mine.

Therefore, if an increase in the block size cap creates a surplus of block-space, and transaction fees start to fall, Bitcoin miners will simply produce smaller blocks. Block sizes will shrink until transaction fees rise to a profitable level. These fees will be able turn a profit as long as there is a high enough demand for transactions, even if the maximum block size is unlimited.

What is the best crypto casino in July 2022? Read our comprehensive comparison! We made deposits, played and reviewed 80+ crypto casinos to choose the best one.

The “Race to the Bottom” Argument Employs Flawed Monopoly Theory

Bitcoin Mining Profitability A potential rebuttal to my above point is that miners being forced to decrease the size of their blocks to maintain profitability will allow larger mining firms to produce larger blocks, creating lower fees, which would allow large firms to take over the market. Essentially, raising the block size limit will initiate a “race to the bottom,” where big miners absorbing the shocks of falling fees unfairly push the little guys out of the game.

This argument should sound familiar, because anti-market political pundits have used it as justification to legally limit the size of business firms for over a century. However, the argument is based on flawed monopoly theory.

In reality, there would not be much of an incentive for a large firm to undercut a smaller one unless the larger firm knew that it could better satisfy the market and bring in more profit. The large firm would be unable to undercut the competition, corner the market, and then raise prices above previous levels without making any changes in the goods or services provided. If a business attempted to do such a thing, smaller firms would simply return to the market and offer their old, lower prices, taking business away from their big competitor.

Many people use John D. Rockefeller’s Standard Oil “monopoly” as a historical example of their flawed monopoly theory in action. Rockefeller would enter a new area, offer his goods for a lower price than the competitors, and take over the market. These people say that Standard Oil was being “predatory.” As it turned out, though, Rockefeller had simply devised a more efficient way of refining oil. Standard Oil did not use its sheer size to “unfairly” force competition out, it merely produced the same products as the competitors at a lower cost, which undoubtedly benefitted consumers.

The same is true for Bitcoin mining firms. Barring the attainment of special governmental privileges, large mining firms will only be able to push out small competitors and keep them out as long as they maintain a true competitive advantage, providing real benefits to the market.

Bitcoin Mining Firms will Grow, But a Block Size Limit Can’t Stop Centralization

Bitcoin Mining ProfitabilityHowever, in regards to Bitcoin, there is one aspect of the economics of competition that is negative. Due to economies of scale, Bitcoin mining firms will grow to an empirically optimal size — which possibly means that one firm could gain 51% or more of the network’s hashing power. While a firm controlling 51% of the hashing power does not create any economic inefficiencies, it greatly diminishes the security of the Bitcoin network. The hallmark of Bitcoin lies in its decentralization, taking that away would erase a large amount of the Bitcoin community’s confidence in the network.

The fact of the matter is, however, that a cap on the Bitcoin block size will not stop Bitcoin mining centralization in the slightest. The problem with mining centralization is not found in transaction fees, but rather the economies of scale created by the costs of running Bitcoin mining hardware. Increasing electricity costs makes firm consolidation more efficient, and those larger firms are able to afford lower fees, so the smaller, less efficient competition gets pushed out of the market. Furthermore, when Bitcoin mining profitability falls, small miners will have to shut down their rigs (at least until difficulty retargets), while larger miners enjoying the economies of scale can still efficiently mine at lower revenue levels. A mainstream example of this phenomenon can be found in the current oil price situation. Smaller, high-cost frackers in the United States are being put out of business by low oil prices, while the larger, more efficient drillers of OPEC are absorbing the lower prices with confidence.

Either way, whether mining profitability rises or falls, there will be a tendency towards mining centralization due to economies of scale. Thus, the problem actually has very little to do with transaction fees and almost everything to do with mining costs.

So what does all this mean? If a block size limit will not stop Bitcoin mining centralization, then what will? Unfortunately, I do not know the answer to that question. What I do know, though, is that keeping the current Bitcoin block size limit will hinder the long run scalability of the network, while totally failing to prevent mining centralization. The solution to network security must be found in some other place.

The only thing the block size limit can do — and was ever intended to do — is prevent spam from bloating the blockchain and damaging the network. As the Bitcoin economy grows, and more transactions are sent over the blockchain, the network will be able to handle larger blocks without inviting malicious spam attacks. Therefore, when considering the economic arguments I advanced in this article, combined with Gavin Andresen’s testing, gradually increasing the block size limit seems like a safe scalability option.

What do you think about raising the block size limit? Let us know in the comments below!

Images courtesy of Yevgeniy Brikman, “The Rise and Rise of Bitcoin,” and The Finance Guy.

This author’s views do not necessarily reflect those of Bitcoinist.net.  

ShareTweetShareShare

Sign Up for Our Newsletter!

For updates and exclusive offers enter your email.

I consent to my submitted data being collected and stored.
Evan Faggart

Evan Faggart

Evan is the Senior Editor of Bitcoinist.net. He has a bachelor's degree in History with minors in Economics and Political Science. When he's not acting like he knows what he's doing in the newsroom, Evan is most likely playing video games. Follow Evan on Twitter @EvanFaggart.

Related Posts

Reports Show Alexander Vinnik, BTC Exchange Operator Extradited To The U.S.

Reports Show Alexander Vinnik, BTC Exchange Operator Extradited To The U.S.

15 hours ago
Bitcoin

Bitcoin Is A ‘Remarkable Cryptographic Achievement,’ Ex-Google CEO Says

20 hours ago
Touadéra, a coin with Binance's logo

Binance’s CZ Visits The Central African Republic, Meets President Touadéra

2 days ago
Data Shows Bitcoin Still Highly Correlated With Stock Market

Data Shows Bitcoin Still Highly Correlated With Stock Market

2 days ago
Fintech

Fintech Firm Revolut Unfazed By Bear Market, Hires 20% More Crypto Talent

2 days ago
Tourism In El Salvador Rises Regardless Of The Bitcoin Bear Run

Tourism In El Salvador Rises In Spite Of Bitcoin Bear Run

3 days ago

Bitcoin news portal providing breaking news, guides, price analysis about decentralized digital money & blockchain technology.

Bitcoin

  • News
  • Price
  • Businesses
  • Acceptance
  • Technology
  • Investment
  • Regulation
  • Reviews

Altcoins

  • News
  • Price
  • Ethereum
  • Ripple
  • Litecoin
  • EOS
  • NAGA

Categories

  • Blockchain
  • Security
  • FinTech
  • Technology
  • Trending
  • Breaking News
  • Press Releases
  • How to

Pages

  • Contact us
  • Editorial Policy
  • Advertise
  • Crypto Prices from Nomics
© 2022 Bitcoinist.com. All Rights Reserved.
  • Bitcoin
    • News
    • Price
    • Businesses
    • Acceptance
    • Technology
    • Investment
    • Regulation
    • Reviews
    • All Bitcoin News
  • Altcoins
    • News
    • Price
    • Ethereum
    • Ripple
    • Litecoin
    • EOS
    • NAGA
    • All Altcoin News
  • Tech
    • Blockchain
    • Security
    • FinTech
  • Industry
    • Press releases
  • Price
    • Bitcoin Price
    • Ethereum Price
    • Litecoin Price
    • Binance Coin Price
    • Monero Price
    • MimbleWimbleCoin Price
  • How to
    • Buy gift cards/mobile Top Ups with Cryptos
    • What Is Bitcoin?
    • Best Bitcoin Wallet
    • Bitcoin vs Ethereum
    • Why Use Blockchain Technology?
    • Bitcoin Cash ABC vs. Bitcoin Cash SV
    • How to Buy Cryptocurrency
    • Bitcoin Mining
    • Best Bitcoin Brokers
    • Best Bitcoin Forex Brokers
    • How To Earn Bitcoin
    • What is Facebook Libra?
    • Ripple and XRP: The Complete Guide
    • Bitcoin Casinos – Where, What and How to Play
  • Play Games
  • BET&WIN
  • Bitcoin Casino Reviews

© 2021 Bitcoinist. All Rights Reserved.

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Center or Cookie Policy.